Outrage and Retaliation
Jun. 11th, 2003 09:02 amSo have you seen the news item aboutThing Underwear for 7-Year-Olds?
http://www.jsonline.com/news/gen/may02/43941.asp
In a nut-shell, Abercrombie & Fitch is selling sexy thong underwear for 7-to-10-year-old little girls. Not just thing underwear, but thong underwear with designs that say "Eye Candy" and "Wink Wink" on them. You know, the type of stuff that any 7-year-old little girl would want to wear while she's out prowling the local Rave sceene looking for a guy to screw in a bathroom stall.
Everybody get in the handbasket, we're going to Hell.
This is the first thing I've been OUTRAGED by in a long time. This is even worse than Rob Liefeld drawing Captain America! So of course, I have planned a retaliation of sorts.
First off, you have to know what I look like. 330 Lbs, unshaven, thick glasses... I have a very Evening News-worthy "Parents Are Urged To Be On The Look-Out And Keep Their Children Away From *THIS MAN*" look to me. This weekend, I will be visiting as many Abercrombie & Fitch stores as i can find. I'm going to hang out around the Kiddie-Thongs and strike up conversations with all the potential customers, using my best low-grumbly "Kid-Toucher" voice. Nothing incriminating or illegal, just stuff like "Mmmmmmmmyeah... she's going to look *very* nice in those. You know, you have a *very* beautiful daughter... do you have any, you know... pictures?"
Nothing against the law about complimenting a child's apearance and asking to see pictures, right? Parents *LOVE* to show off pictures of their kids!
Anyway, if *you* can do a good "Kid Toucher" act, I strongly suggest that you join me this weekend :)
http://www.jsonline.com/news/gen/may02/43941.asp
In a nut-shell, Abercrombie & Fitch is selling sexy thong underwear for 7-to-10-year-old little girls. Not just thing underwear, but thong underwear with designs that say "Eye Candy" and "Wink Wink" on them. You know, the type of stuff that any 7-year-old little girl would want to wear while she's out prowling the local Rave sceene looking for a guy to screw in a bathroom stall.
Everybody get in the handbasket, we're going to Hell.
This is the first thing I've been OUTRAGED by in a long time. This is even worse than Rob Liefeld drawing Captain America! So of course, I have planned a retaliation of sorts.
First off, you have to know what I look like. 330 Lbs, unshaven, thick glasses... I have a very Evening News-worthy "Parents Are Urged To Be On The Look-Out And Keep Their Children Away From *THIS MAN*" look to me. This weekend, I will be visiting as many Abercrombie & Fitch stores as i can find. I'm going to hang out around the Kiddie-Thongs and strike up conversations with all the potential customers, using my best low-grumbly "Kid-Toucher" voice. Nothing incriminating or illegal, just stuff like "Mmmmmmmmyeah... she's going to look *very* nice in those. You know, you have a *very* beautiful daughter... do you have any, you know... pictures?"
Nothing against the law about complimenting a child's apearance and asking to see pictures, right? Parents *LOVE* to show off pictures of their kids!
Anyway, if *you* can do a good "Kid Toucher" act, I strongly suggest that you join me this weekend :)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 09:28 am (UTC)AAGH! So put them back in their underoos! There is nothing at all wrong with cartoon character underoos. They are modest and kiddish whereas thongs are entirely immodest and, in my personal opinion, slutty. There is no reason in the world why any little girl should need a thong. The guy said something about how they weren't appropriate for 7 year olds, but they were for 10 year olds?!?! How does that make any sense? No 10 year old should be worried about hiding their panty line. And what 10 year old would be wearing clothes tight enough to have that problem? AAGH!!
No daughter of mine will ever wear thong underwear that young (and if I have anything to say about it, ever. I hate them personally). Though the idea of pretending to be a scary kid-toucher might backfire on you. Careful there. I'd boycott them, except I've already been boycotting them for years. Need some new form of protest...
no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 09:34 am (UTC)I think we're pretty liberal with our 10 year old - she's allowed to wear 2-piece bathing suits, cute underwear (mostly Disney princesses), and various other "in style" things. But I can't imagine a) her wanting thong underwear - seriously, who wants a wedgie on purpose, or b) what sort of parent *would* allow thong underwear on a child that age. It's sick.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 09:41 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 09:42 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 09:45 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 09:58 am (UTC)seriously, can't they be taken to court for this?
Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 10:13 am (UTC)Of course we can not forget the pedophiles. I'm sure they'll be buying these up when they go on clearance.
I agree, how DARE they spoil the innocent fun of Underoos by comparing then to this sick sh*t! I mean really! A hero for a little girl like Ariel or Wonder Woman the same as a thong that says EYE CANDY!!!! That term alone (even on regular briefs) would piss me off!
Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 10:28 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 10:38 am (UTC)that fucking rocks. that is possibly the funniest thing i've read in days... Do it!!!!!!!! Do it!!! Bring a camera......
no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 10:43 am (UTC)I worked at a jewellry/accessory store here in Canada called Ardene, and we sold thongs and little tank tops with y'know a hand print ant the word 'off' or hot stuff, or butterflies, or whatever. Now, i bought some, and own them, but i'm 27, so.... But 10 year old girls flocked into the store and bought all the smalls and extra smalls the first few days they were out. then came back in the store days later to buy other stuff wearing the thongs showing above their jeans, with packs of little mall boys following them. It was GROSS
Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 10:50 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 11:10 am (UTC)Hell in a blue rubber dinghy! Straight to it!
Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 11:12 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 11:26 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-11 11:34 am (UTC)Captain America would do it
no subject
Date: 2003-06-11 11:53 am (UTC)P.S. I'll pass on your offer -- my luck, I'll wind up getting arrested.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 08:18 am (UTC)