I grabbed this from
Mark Evanier's Web Blog (POVOnline.com) and decided to re-post it because it directly relates to the conversation that
khristle and I were having the other day about the government and all the recording and the listening and the breaking of the Constitutional Commandments and whatnot:
To those who argue, "If you're not doing anything you shouldn't be doing, you should have no problem with having your calls monitored," I note that "wrong" is in the eye of the beholder. One of the most telling examples from recent history were from McCarthyism, where people who had associated with others legally (either because it was before the 1940 passage of the Smith Act or because the people they had associated with weren't part of the Communist party until years later) were still forced to testify and account for those actions years later; lives were destroyed.
As a more nuts-and-bolts example, I suspect many of these people saying, "If you're not doing anything wrong..." still wouldn't want to be, say, audited on their taxes every year for the rest of their lives. Yet, why should they object? After all, if they're filing their taxes correctly, then they shouldn't have a problem having to disrupt their lives for a week or so every year, getting files together, making sure everything is documented so that another person can pour over it, etc. And, of course, they should be willing to pay whatever fees or penalties for filing incorrectly on the off chance that they have made a mistake within their half-inch of papers; after all, they obviously did something wrong in that case, right?
This is EXACTLY the point I was trying to make with her (
khristle was in agreeance with the "If You're Not Doing Anything Wrong" position, where as I was in the "But... but... MCARTHYISM!" camp).
On the one hand I deeply fear complete government control... but on the other hand, I don't see us ever having a "Star Trek" future without it!